Our +/- average per possession for the year is now a pathetic +0.12 per possession
Here's our numbers based off how we use our bigs.
Only 1 Big
Hunter Only: 156 offensive, 142 defensive, -18 (-0.12)
Flory Only: 117 offensive, 123 defensive, -4 (-0.03)
Adams Only: 17 offensive, 18 defensive, -3 (-0.17)
Clemence Only: 2 offensive, 3 defensive, +5 (+2.0)
Total: 292 offensive, 286 defensive, -20 (-0.07)
Total without Clemence: 290 offensive, 283 defensive, -25 (-0.09)
2 Bigs
Hunter & Adams: 838 offensive, 844 defensive, +124 (+0.15)
Hunter & Flory: 292 offensive, 287 defensive, +66 (+0.23)
Adams & Flory: 255 offensive, 256 defensive, +42 (+0.16)
Flory & Clemence: 32 offensive, 33 defensive, +10 (+0.31)
Adams & Clemence: 15 offensive, 17 defensive, -7 (-0.44)
Hunter & Clemence: 14 offensive, 13 defensive, +7 (+0.52)
Total: 1,446 offensive, 1,450 defensive, +242 (+0.17)
Total without Clemence: 1,385 offensive, 1,387 defensive, +232 (+0.17)
3 Bigs
Adams, Flory & Hunter: 26 offensive, 29 defensive, -7 (-0.25)
0 Bigs: 4 offensive, 4 defensive, 0 (0.0)
In conclusion:
1 big doesn't work
3 bigs hasn't worked, but small sample size and BYU was not the team to try it on
2 bigs is best, and Flory and Hunter does the best
Or top 5 lineups with Hunter and Flory
1. Harris/Coit/Griffen: 14 offensive, 13 defensive, +16 (+1.19)
2. Harris/Coit/Storr: 16 offensive, 15 defensive, +12 (+0.77)
3. Harris/Coit/Mayo: 30 offensive, 25 defensive, +19 (+0.69)
4. Harris/Mayo/Storr: 17 offensive, 15 defensive, +9 (+0.56)
5. Harris/Mayo/Griffen: 50 offensive, 50 defensive, +17 (+0.34)
Top 5 Overall Lineups that don't include Clemence
1. Moore, Coit, Griffen, Adams, Flory: 4 offensive, 5 defensive, +11 (+2.44)
2. Harris, Griffen, Storr, Adams, Hunter: 4 offensive, 3 defensive, +6 (+1.71) HOW HAS THIS OBVIOUS LINEUP NEVER BEEN USED???
3. Harris, Moore, Coit, Storr, Flory: 6 offensive, 5 defensive, +9 (+1.64)
4. Moore, Mayo, Storr, Adams, Hunter: 5 offensive, 5 defensive, +8 (+1.60)
5. Harris, Moore, Griffen, Adams, Flory: 4 offensive, 3 defensive, +5 (+1.43)
Here's our numbers based off how we use our bigs.
Only 1 Big
Hunter Only: 156 offensive, 142 defensive, -18 (-0.12)
Flory Only: 117 offensive, 123 defensive, -4 (-0.03)
Adams Only: 17 offensive, 18 defensive, -3 (-0.17)
Clemence Only: 2 offensive, 3 defensive, +5 (+2.0)
Total: 292 offensive, 286 defensive, -20 (-0.07)
Total without Clemence: 290 offensive, 283 defensive, -25 (-0.09)
2 Bigs
Hunter & Adams: 838 offensive, 844 defensive, +124 (+0.15)
Hunter & Flory: 292 offensive, 287 defensive, +66 (+0.23)
Adams & Flory: 255 offensive, 256 defensive, +42 (+0.16)
Flory & Clemence: 32 offensive, 33 defensive, +10 (+0.31)
Adams & Clemence: 15 offensive, 17 defensive, -7 (-0.44)
Hunter & Clemence: 14 offensive, 13 defensive, +7 (+0.52)
Total: 1,446 offensive, 1,450 defensive, +242 (+0.17)
Total without Clemence: 1,385 offensive, 1,387 defensive, +232 (+0.17)
3 Bigs
Adams, Flory & Hunter: 26 offensive, 29 defensive, -7 (-0.25)
0 Bigs: 4 offensive, 4 defensive, 0 (0.0)
In conclusion:
1 big doesn't work
3 bigs hasn't worked, but small sample size and BYU was not the team to try it on
2 bigs is best, and Flory and Hunter does the best
Or top 5 lineups with Hunter and Flory
1. Harris/Coit/Griffen: 14 offensive, 13 defensive, +16 (+1.19)
2. Harris/Coit/Storr: 16 offensive, 15 defensive, +12 (+0.77)
3. Harris/Coit/Mayo: 30 offensive, 25 defensive, +19 (+0.69)
4. Harris/Mayo/Storr: 17 offensive, 15 defensive, +9 (+0.56)
5. Harris/Mayo/Griffen: 50 offensive, 50 defensive, +17 (+0.34)
Top 5 Overall Lineups that don't include Clemence
1. Moore, Coit, Griffen, Adams, Flory: 4 offensive, 5 defensive, +11 (+2.44)
2. Harris, Griffen, Storr, Adams, Hunter: 4 offensive, 3 defensive, +6 (+1.71) HOW HAS THIS OBVIOUS LINEUP NEVER BEEN USED???
3. Harris, Moore, Coit, Storr, Flory: 6 offensive, 5 defensive, +9 (+1.64)
4. Moore, Mayo, Storr, Adams, Hunter: 5 offensive, 5 defensive, +8 (+1.60)
5. Harris, Moore, Griffen, Adams, Flory: 4 offensive, 3 defensive, +5 (+1.43)
