Ok, this is taken by the ranking of the team when played, so there is some fluctuation (KU gets no credit for Georgetown, while Villanova does). Villanova's wins are "bottom top 25 heavy" (Goergetown, Providence, Butler etc)
UK: 5-0
KU:10-4
UVA: 4-3
Duke: 7-2
MD: 2-2
UW: 2-2
UA::4-0
Gonzaga:1-1
Vill: 6-0
It will be interesting how the #2 seeds are judged. Everyone talks very highly of Wiscy, it's easy to look so good for the "eye" test when your schedule is so week (one of their top 25 wins is IU). They are very good but would their record be so glossy in the Big 12 - I think not.
Gonzaga should be the last 2 seed if not a 3.
Duke should clearly get the 1 over UVA
UK: 5-0
KU:10-4
UVA: 4-3
Duke: 7-2
MD: 2-2
UW: 2-2
UA::4-0
Gonzaga:1-1
Vill: 6-0
It will be interesting how the #2 seeds are judged. Everyone talks very highly of Wiscy, it's easy to look so good for the "eye" test when your schedule is so week (one of their top 25 wins is IU). They are very good but would their record be so glossy in the Big 12 - I think not.
Gonzaga should be the last 2 seed if not a 3.
Duke should clearly get the 1 over UVA