I am no guru on recruiting but even I can see things are not evaluated equally in the team rankings. They simply do not consider the total class and the quality of it to determine where a team ranks. We have a higher quality of recruit than at least 10 teams ranked ahead of us because they are counting a higher number of recruits than our 15.
The only reason I bring this up is if those kids that counted against this class that are already on the roster were figured into our ranking we would be much higher than we are.
So, the question really is for me, who would I trade with. That tells me whether I like our class better than any others they might be compared to. The difficulty there is that each class in recruited with that team's needs in mind so probably no one would trade personnel for personnel. But what you can do if you take the time is see who has helped themselves the most with this year's class.
That sounds like a task for someone with both the skills and understanding to to.
So, ESU is assigned the responsibility to evaluate who has helped themselves the most among ISU, KU and KSU. Just kidding ESU, but you might at least think about it and give an opinion.
The only reason I bring this up is if those kids that counted against this class that are already on the roster were figured into our ranking we would be much higher than we are.
So, the question really is for me, who would I trade with. That tells me whether I like our class better than any others they might be compared to. The difficulty there is that each class in recruited with that team's needs in mind so probably no one would trade personnel for personnel. But what you can do if you take the time is see who has helped themselves the most with this year's class.
That sounds like a task for someone with both the skills and understanding to to.
So, ESU is assigned the responsibility to evaluate who has helped themselves the most among ISU, KU and KSU. Just kidding ESU, but you might at least think about it and give an opinion.
