ADVERTISEMENT

food for thought-supreme court rulings

viviajm

viviajm

Ring of Honor
Gold Member
May 14, 2004
17,131
3,450
0
82
Liberty, MO
Today the supreme court ruled in favor of Hobby Lobby and therefore other "closely held corporations". I enerstand this ruling. However, I started thinking about a previous ruling in that corporations we looked upon as people when donating to political candidates. It may be a stretched but it strikkes me that both types of corporations are "people" when contributing, than why should it be different in today's ruling. Why shouldn't today's ruling also cover larger corporations? Ergo, today's ruling should have been extended to cover the will of larger corporations. Then if so then the same should be said for other things such as the ACA, if other individuals don't want it.

Posted from the Jayhawk Slant App
Posted from wireless.rivals.com[/URL]
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

knaup1

Kansas "Value Them Both Amendment" yard signs

Replies
62
Views
2K
The Slant Political Board
floydmaster
F
viviajm

Another interesting thought

Replies
0
Views
375
The Slant Political Board
viviajm
viviajm
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT
Top Bottom
Back

Go Big.
Get Premium.

Join Rivals.com to access this premium section.

  • Member-Only Message Boards
  • Exclusive coverage of Rivals Series
  • Exclusive Recruiting Interviews
  • Breaking Recruiting News
Log in or subscribe today Go Back